The articles and opinions on the TEPAV website are solely those of the authors and do not represent the official views of TEPAV.
© TEPAV, all rights reserved unless otherwise stated.
Söğütözü Cad. No:43 TOBB-ETÜ Campus, Section 2, 06560 Söğütözü-Ankara
Phone: +90 312 292 5500Fax: +90 312 292 5555
tepav@tepav.org.tr / tepav.org.trTEPAV is a non-profit, non-partisan research institution that contributes to the policy design process through data-driven analysis, adhering to academic ethics and quality without compromise.
We appear to be living in an age of current account reversals. Just have  a look at the graph below, taken from a TEPAV study. If you take both  the current account surplus and deficit countries, i.e., top 10 from  each side, there is a convergence in the past decade. That makes it a  period of current account reversal – meaning less macro imbalance in the  World. Analysis shows the growth impact of the current account surplus  reversals is more benign than that of current account deficit reversals.  Turkey has always been, and still is, a current account deficit  country. There are countries that took measures to lower macro  imbalances and those that did not. Turkey belongs to the second group.
Current account reversals in the highest 10 surplus and highest 10 deficit countries (as % of GDP)
 Source: IMF WEO (October 2013) 
The Turkish Lira is now around 2.18, testing deeper waters.  Wonder why the lira is still under pressure? Just look at the graph.  There is less imbalance in the world now. The U.S. current account  deficit has declined from 4.8% in 2007-2008, to 2.7% in 2012-2013.  China’s current account surplus has also declined from 9.7% to 2.7% in  the same time period. So is there less imbalance in the world? Yes, but  not in the case of Turkey. The Turkish current account deficit has  widened from 5.7% to 6.7%. If you take a longer period, it has increased  from 5.4% in 2005-2008, to 7.4% in 2010-2013. In a period of less  global macroeconomic imbalances, Turkey has chosen to become more  unbalanced. That is not good when the time comes for the tide to go, and  it is going with the relative returns rising in the U.S. Bad omen for  Turkey. 
The current account deficit is a structural  characteristic of the Turkish economy. It is very hard to change. It was  with us in the 1950s, and it remains with us today. When it comes to  the current account imbalance in Turkey: Ask not what to do to eliminate  the current account deficit of the country, ask what is needed to  manage the imbalance. That is what we need; a better macro management  team that is aware of the changing tides around the globe. Wonder why  Turkey is one of the first to implement financial liberalization  reforms? It was trying to manage the current account deficit in a time  of changing tides. That was at the end of the Cold War.  Government-to-government funding in hard currency was on the decline, as  private markets became the primary tool of channeling international  fund flows. During the Cold War, Turkey received funding because of its  location – an ally located closely to the Soviet Union, after all, could  not be lost. When that changed, Turkey focused on designing private  channels for fund inflows. It created new markets, new instruments and  new privatization programs. 
It seems that we have missed the  change of the tide this time. We need to strengthen the macro management  team in Ankara, if you ask me. Turgut Bey was far better in handling  such major changes.
This commentary was published in Hürriyet Daily News on 11.01.2014

15/09/2025

N. Murat Ersavcı
10/06/2025

N. Murat Ersavcı
10/12/2024

N. Murat Ersavcı
27/03/2024

N. Murat Ersavcı
07/12/2022