Archive

  • March 2024 (1)
  • December 2022 (1)
  • March 2022 (1)
  • January 2022 (1)
  • November 2021 (1)
  • October 2021 (1)
  • September 2021 (2)
  • August 2021 (4)
  • July 2021 (3)
  • June 2021 (4)
  • May 2021 (5)
  • April 2021 (2)

    Will Turkey be cautious in 2016, or will it be bold?

    Güven Sak, PhD27 December 2015 - Okunma Sayısı: 1036

    How do I see Turkey in 2016? That is one of the questions I have been asked frequently in the last few weeks. As New Year’s Eve is fast approaching, let me clarify my position: I consider 2016 to be a trying year for Turkey. Even though the odds will not be in our favor, the overall outcome will heavily depend upon how Turks are going to deal with the issues at hand. So 2016 can either be a year of living boldly or a year of living cautiously for Turks. I think we should all err on the side of caution.

    So why will 2016 be a trying year for Turkey? Because, we have at least two structural and one conjunctural problem at hand. Turkish growth up until now was largely driven by internal migration. As Turks moved away from their rural homes and agricultural jobs and resettled in urban areas, their productivities increased exponentially. Now that the urbanization rate of Turkey has reached the urbanization rate of Germany, however, the country needs to do new things to keep the productivity growing. It needs a new and sustainable growth strategy. This is the first impending structural issue we are facing.

    Secondly, the Fed’s tightening will unavoidably have a negative impact on the Turkish economy. Similar to all mid-sized emerging markets, Turkey has been heavily dependent on foreign savings to grow. The high current account deficit has become a structural component of the Turkish economy. Now that component is going to meet with Fed tightening. What does that mean? It means that 2016 is likely to be a year of lower preference for Turkish assets for the foreigners. So, if Turkey does not take the necessary measures to keep foreign funds inside, they will go back.

    Thirdly, we also need to take into account the potential impact of Russian sanctions. Russia has been an important trading partner of Turkey. Impact of the oil price decline was already reflected in our trading figures, if you ask me. So far in 2015, the number of Russian tourists visiting Turkey have already declined by a quarter – almost a full million – compared to the previous year. Now, the conjunctural situation will exacerbate the structural one and we are likely to see a further decline in Russian tourists. Turkish exports to Russia were already declining, now expect a sharper decrease with the sanctions. So what can be the overall damage of the Russian crisis to Turkish economy when all is said and done? A recent study by TEPAV economists estimate that the Russian crisis can shave almost a full percentage point from Turkey’s 2016 growth prospects. The latest IMF forecast for Turkey’s 2016 growth was around 2.8 percent. After the Russian crisis, this may go as low as 2.0 percent.

    Turkish Central Bank’s recent decision needs to be understood within this setting, if you ask me. Turkey is about to enter a year of living on the edge when it comes to the economy. Factors limiting the growth prospects are expected to be stronger than usual this year. And the above list of contractionary impulses is not even exhaustive, mind you. Scenes from Diyarbakır are starting to resemble Aleppo and Ramadi more and more every day. Can you expect a surge in foreign direct investments to Turkey in this environment? Of course, not.

    What is wrong with the Central Bank’s decision then? Turkey now needs a less opaque, more transparent Central Bank. Yet we still have a maverick Central Bank. I had written the following in this very same column in May 2011: “Either the bank has difficulty in formulating and conveying its message or there is no message to convey. Either way, there is an apparent disconnection. That is what we have in Turkey, for now. We have a maverick Central Bank speaking in a language unknown to market participants.” Unfortunately, this still holds true as we are about to enter into 2016.

    So in this setting of, Turkey can either be bold or cautious in 2016. It can either cut its losses and lower perceived risks, or go all in and put investors on edge. With a hand this lousy, I’d wait for the next round.

    This commentary was published in Hürriyet Daily News on 26.12.2015

    Tags:
    Yazdır